nanog mailing list archives
RE: new.net
From: Ken Eddings <eddingsk () apple com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:53:56 -0800
No don't do that. I get too much mail from well-meaning folks that think our registry records have been hacked.
No. I usually depend on Network Solutions to hack our records, ;-) Cheers, At 4:59 PM -0800 3/8/01, Mathew Butler wrote:
You -could- always do the whois-type thing, where ALL records containing 'apple' are returned, on first access to the name?-Mat Butler -----Original Message----- From: Simon Lockhart [<mailto:simonl () rd bbc co uk>mailto:simonl () rd bbc co uk] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 2:32 PM To: richb () pioneer ci net Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: new.net >Therefore any company which creates a broader hierarchy is not motivatedby what's best for Internet users, who are best served by a simplehierarchy (IBM is IBM is IBM no matter what you append to it).Okay. You picked an example which proves your point. However, there's plenty of exceptions. Who should have "apple" in this flat namespace? Apple Computers? Apple Records? Apple Fruitstore? While the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) is a fairly well-known name worldwide, what gives us more claim to "bbc" in the flat namespace than "Big Blue and Cousins" or "Baptist Bible College" (bbc.org and bbc.edu respectively)? Have we now got bbc.com because we had a greater claim to it, or because we had the better lawyers? Simon -- Simon Lockhart | Tel: +44 (0)1737 839676 Internet Engineering Manager | Fax: +44 (0)1737 839516 BBC Internet Services | Email: Simon.Lockhart () bbc co ukKingswood Warren,Tadworth,Surrey,UK | URL: <http://support.bbc.co.uk/>http://support.bbc.co.uk/
-- Ken Eddings, Hostmaster, IS&T, eddingsk () apple com, eddingsk () ricochet net Work:+1 408 974-4286 Pager: +1 408 699-3591, Fax: +1 408 974-1560 Apple Computer, Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, M/S 60-DR Cupertino, CA 95014 The Prudent Mariner never relies solely on any single aid to navigation.
Current thread:
- RE: new.net, (continued)
- RE: new.net Mike Batchelor (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Charles Scott (Mar 10)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net David Schwartz (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Josh Richards (Mar 10)
- Re: new.net Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 12)
- Re: new.net Martin Hannigan (Mar 08)
- RE: new.net Ken Eddings (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net Shawn McMahon (Mar 09)
- RE: new.net Ian Cooper (Mar 09)