nanog mailing list archives

Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement...

From: Joe Abley <jabley () automagic org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:00:36 -0400


On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:43:35PM -0400, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:

On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:38:28PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:

What BGP acceptance tests do people currently run against prospective
vendors' hardware?


QA Robot

http://advanced.comms.agilent.com/qarobot/


Does that expose the RFC3065 issue if you run it against vendor C's
implementations?


Joe

Current thread:

Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement..., (continued)
- - Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... Jared Mauch (Jun 26)
- RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... Sean Donelan (Jun 26)
  - RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... E.B. Dreger (Jun 27)
    - Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... Joe Abley (Jun 27)
- RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... Matt Levine (Jun 27)
  - RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... E.B. Dreger (Jun 27)
    - Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... lucifer (Jun 27)
    - Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... Steve Schaefer (Jun 27)
    - Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... Adam Rothschild (Jun 27)
- Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 27)
  - Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... Joe Abley (Jun 27)
    - RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... Chance Whaley (Jun 27)