nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferior]
From: Dee McKinney <deem () wdm com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:23:14 -0800 (AKDT)
Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred () gwi net> wrote:
Personally, I think PPPoE belongs in the "bad idea box" along with IPoATM and MPLS.
IPoATM for sure, but MPLS also ? I have my thoughts similiar to MPLS but until I get my Sycamore boxes up and running, I don't know how bad it will be. Under CISCO it has limitations for sure. /Dee
Current thread:
- Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferior] Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 25)
- Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferior] Pim van Riezen (Jun 25)
- Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferior] Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 25)
- RE: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferior] Timothy R. McKee (Jun 25)
- Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferior] Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 25)
- Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferior] Dee McKinney (Jun 25)
- Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferior] Pim van Riezen (Jun 25)