nanog mailing list archives

Re: Multicast Traffic on Backbones


From: David Charlap <david.charlap () marconi com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:26:52 -0400


David Schwartz wrote:
John Olp wrote:

The argument that multicast should be billed based on the number of
receivers is flawed.  Those receivers are already being billed
based on the bandwidth they use regardless of source.

They are billed by their ISP for the traffic they receive. This
doesn't cover the cost of sending the data to them on the sourcing
ISP. This is why you pay for both traffic you send and for traffic
you receive. Both cost your provider money to do for you.

Nice bit of double-billing.

One packet traverses the network, and two people pay for it.

-- David


Current thread: