nanog mailing list archives
Re: Houston problems?
From: Scott Francis <darkuncle () darkuncle net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:54:46 -0700
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:21:06PM -0400, Tim Wilde exclaimed:
Easy there Jason, I think that the 95th percentile of NANOG readers understood Richard's joke to be some sort of reference to packet flooding as further evidenced by the net smiley with which he ended his email. What with all the sarcasm on this list, a bit of humor is most welcome.But my average five-minute sample of NANOG readers in fact found that they saw it as a highly inflammatory remark. Which is better?!
hrm, that'd make you about 4 minutes 30 seconds longer in your sample rate than said inflammatory remarkers. :)
Tim -:)
-- Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t UNIX | IP networks | security | sysadmin | caffeine | BOFH | general geekery GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7 illum oportet crescere me autem minui http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCB33CCA7
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Houston problems? Jason Legate (Jun 11)
- Re: Houston problems? John Fraizer (Jun 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Houston problems? Rishi Singh (Jun 11)
- Re: Houston problems? Marius Strom (Jun 12)
- Re: Houston problems? Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 11)
- Re: Houston problems? Jason Legate (Jun 11)
- RE: Houston problems? Paul Lantinga (Jun 11)
- RE: Houston problems? Tim Wilde (Jun 11)
- Re: Houston problems? Scott Francis (Jun 12)
- RE: Houston problems? Tim Wilde (Jun 11)
- RE: Houston problems? Mark Borchers (Jun 12)