nanog mailing list archives
top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format postings]
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:36:14 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Todd Suiter wrote:
People who top post actually bother you? Is the other way around for me, and several people I know. I always just figured people who bottom posted were too lazy to go back to the top of the mail. Who'd a thunk? HTML, on
Being quite a newbie at this (having only done email and Fidonet since 1987 (mostly Fido, email not until 1991)) I'd say that historically top-posting is a MEMO standard thingie, being done mostly by GUI users (ie Microsoft/Mac prone) and email/Fidonet have always been bottom-posters (or rather, actually quoting with > and commenting after each section of text). Top posting and leaving the whole email under what you wrote, I did not see att all basically until Outlook and Eudora (and alike) started showing up as email clients in the wider population. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- HTML-format postings M. David Leonard (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings Charles Scott (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings John Butler (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings David Lesher (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings Todd Suiter (Jun 06)
- top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format postings] Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 06)
- Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format postings] Pim van Riezen (Jun 06)
- Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format postings] Todd Suiter (Jun 06)
- Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format postings] John Payne (Jun 07)
- Re: top/bottom posting [Re: HTML-format postings] Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 07)
- Re: HTML-format postings Charles Scott (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings Jonas Luster (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings Todd Suiter (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings John Fraizer (Jun 06)
- Re: HTML-format postings Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 06)