nanog mailing list archives
Re: C&W Peering Problem?
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
> Seems that C&W no longer has full routes. Well, don't let your rhetoric get too far out ahead of the facts: AS PfxRcd 1 94319 1239 95748 701 98084 3561 101262 <-- Cable & Wireless 6461 102686 715 96438 -Bill
Current thread:
- C&W Peering Problem? Charles Scott (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Charles Scott (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? David Diaz (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Simon Lockhart (Jun 01)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Jason Lewis (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 01)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Scott Patterson (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Christian Nielsen (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Simon Lockhart (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Bill Woodcock (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? David Diaz (Jun 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Karyn Ulriksen (Jun 01)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Sean Donelan (Jun 01)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Steve Schaefer (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Jeff Mcadams (Jun 02)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Sean Donelan (Jun 01)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Vivien M. (Jun 01)
- Re: C&W Peering Problem? Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 02)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Albert Meyer (Jun 02)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Mike Leber (Jun 01)
- RE: C&W Peering Problem? Vivien M. (Jun 01)