nanog mailing list archives

Re: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ?


From: Charles Sprickman <spork () inch com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:40:52 -0400 (EDT)


On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Jared Mauch wrote:

      5) Use some config versioning system to detect changes
to configs and archive them.  This aides in the "who removed
X route" stuff.  This allows you to audit tacacs.log as well
as get diffs of the router configs when the change is made.

6) Finding a unix ssh that supports 3DES and DES.

I curse those OpenSSH folks for making me have to trudge through the code
to find out how to get DES working...

6a) Finding a release on CCO that supports 3DES.

Charles

      I'm sure someone could write a BCP or something like that for
operating a internet connected network as far as securing your
device(s).

      - Jared

On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 09:23:58AM -0400, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:


    Hello All ,  I have charged myself with trying to find a statistic
    on how many individuals responsible for IP core equipment
    recommend telnet or ssh & why particularly .  I will summarize .
            Tia ,  JimL

       +------------------------------------------------------------------+
       | James   W.   Laferriere | System    Techniques | Give me VMS     |
       | Network        Engineer |     P.O. Box 854     |  Give me Linux  |
       | babydr () baby-dragons com | Coudersport PA 16915 |   only  on  AXP |
       +------------------------------------------------------------------+

--
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.



Current thread: