nanog mailing list archives

Re: NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering)

From: "Nipper, Arnold" <arnold () nipper de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 18:38:55 +0200



Sean Donelan schrieb:

exchange points.  Some of the additional exchange points have grown very
large, such as CIX, MAE-West, LINX, AMS-IX, even though they didn't have
NSF's "stamp of approval."


Why should LINX, AMS-IX, DE-CIX or any other European IXP need NSF's "stamp
of approval"?

--Arnold

Current thread:

NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering) Sean Donelan (Jul 26)
- Re: NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering) Nipper, Arnold (Jul 26)
  - Re: NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering) Robert E. Seastrom (Jul 26)
    - Re: NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering) steve wolff (Jul 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering) Sean Donelan (Jul 26)
- Re: NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering) Sean Donelan (Jul 26)
  - Re: NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering) steve wolff (Jul 26)
- Re: NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering) Sean Donelan (Jul 26)
  - Re: NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering) William Allen Simpson (Jul 26)
  - RE: NAP History (was RE: The large ISPs and Peering) Steven Schnell (Jul 26)