nanog mailing list archives

RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..')

From: "Matt Levine" <matt () deliver3 com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:56:18 -0400

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') LBolton (Jul 25)
- Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Dan Hollis (Jul 25)
  - Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Dave Stewart (Jul 25)
    - RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Matt Levine (Jul 25)
    - Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Dan Hollis (Jul 25)
    - Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Adam McKenna (Jul 25)
    - Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Joseph T. Klein (Jul 25)
    - Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Gary E. Miller (Jul 25)
    - RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Chance Whaley (Jul 25)
    - RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Dan Hollis (Jul 25)
    - RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Chance Whaley (Jul 25)
    - RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Gary E. Miller (Jul 25)
    - RE: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Gary E. Miller (Jul 25)
    - Re: product liability (was 'we should all be uncomfortable with the extent to which luck..') Owen DeLong (Jul 25)

(Thread continues...)