nanog mailing list archives
RE: Update: CSX train derailment
From: <up () 3 am>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 12:50:25 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Randy Bush wrote:
I would think that if fiber can be run across oceans without using tunnels or bridges, that it could be run across some rivers much the same way, no?the biggest exposure to cut for wet fiber is shallow water. anchors, idiots, ...
Yes, I can see that; but I imagine you could handle this much the way fiber is handled near the shoreline. Bury it a few feet under the mud or sand. James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up () 3 am http://3.am =========================================================================
Current thread:
- Re: Update: CSX train derailment, (continued)
- Re: Update: CSX train derailment Alex Rubenstein (Jul 20)
- Re: Update: CSX train derailment Charles Sprickman (Jul 20)
- Re: Update: CSX train derailment Nathan Stratton (Jul 20)
- Re: Update: CSX train derailment Sean Donelan (Jul 21)
- Re: Update: CSX train derailment Brian Wallingford (Jul 21)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment Tom Walton (Jul 21)
- Re: Update: CSX train derailment Brian Wallingford (Jul 21)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment Roeland Meyer (Jul 21)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment Brian Wallingford (Jul 21)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment up (Jul 21)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment Randy Bush (Jul 21)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment up (Jul 21)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment Brian Wallingford (Jul 21)
- Message not available
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment Dave Stewart (Jul 21)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment Brian Wallingford (Jul 21)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment Joel Jaeggli (Jul 21)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment Jamie Bowden (Jul 21)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment up (Jul 22)
- RE: Update: CSX train derailment Larry Sheldon (Jul 22)
- Re: Update: CSX train derailment David Lesher (Jul 21)
- Re: Update: CSX train derailment Vincent J. Bono (Jul 21)
- Re: Update: CSX train derailment Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 23)