nanog mailing list archives
Re: When will 128M not be enough?
From: "Nipper, Arnold" <arnold () nipper de>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 18:03:18 +0200
up () 3 am schrieb:
It looks like some recent aggregation has been helping to slow down the growth.
If you look at some figures (e.g. http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr-report.html) it's even pretty stable around 101K prefixes. 128M should do if you only have two or three upstreams, soft reconfiguration disabled and almost nothing else enabled. Does anyone have experience with zebra/mrt/... as a route server?. I need one and would like to you for the cheap server based solution instead of having to buy a fully fledged router. TIA -- Arnold
Current thread:
- When will 128M not be enough? Christopher A. Woodfield (Jul 14)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? up (Jul 14)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Nipper, Arnold (Jul 14)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? mike harrison (Jul 14)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Geoff Huston (Jul 17)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Marko Karppinen (Jul 17)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Nipper, Arnold (Jul 14)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? up (Jul 14)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Bill Woodcock (Jul 14)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? jlewis (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Andy Walden (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? jlewis (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Andy Walden (Jul 15)
- RE: When will 128M not be enough? David Schwartz (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Nipper, Arnold (Jul 15)
- Re: When will 128M not be enough? Andy Walden (Jul 15)