nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
> Can anyone shed some light on why cisco ignores "ip classless" when > redistributing classless connected routes into bgp, making things such as > /30 into /24s? Because you forgot to append the "subnets" keyword to your redist. -Bill
Current thread:
- Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution alex (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution Dave Israel (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution alex (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution Me (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution alex (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution Bill Woodcock (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution Vijay Gill (Jul 13)
- Re: Cisco's connected->bgp redistribution Dave Israel (Jul 13)