nanog mailing list archives
Re: Broadband v. baseband ... again?
From: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:15:11 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:00:52AM -0700, Tom Lettington wrote:
At the risk of incurring the wrath of Mr. Meyer by posting without permission,
What about at the risk of looking like a gigantic idiot in front of a whole 'lot of people?
I offer the following: Harry Newton, of "Newton's TELECOM Dictionary - The Official Dictionary of Telecommunications & the Interent" (Updated 15th Expanded Edition), defines "Broadband" (in the WAN context) as anything over 45Mbps (T3).
Current thread:
- Broadband v. baseband ... again? Roeland Meyer (Jul 05)
- Re: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Miles Fidelman (Jul 05)
- Re: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Christopher B. Zydel (Jul 05)
- Re: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Bill Woodcock (Jul 05)
- RE: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Dennis Dayman (Jul 05)
- Re: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Christopher B. Zydel (Jul 05)
- Re: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Tom Lettington (Jul 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Roeland Meyer (Jul 05)
- Re: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Richard A. Steenbergen (Jul 05)
- Re: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Bill Woodcock (Jul 05)
- RE: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Roeland Meyer (Jul 05)
- RE: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Jeff Harper (Jul 05)
- Re: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 05)
- RE: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Tom Walton (Jul 05)
- Re: Broadband v. baseband ... again? Miles Fidelman (Jul 05)