nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN
From: Jim Duncan <jnduncan () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 21:30:33 -0500
Sean Donelan writes:
Microsoft appears to be blaming ICANN for the failure with Microft's domain name servers (all located at the same place at Microsoft). Microsoft has yet to pin down the cause of the DNS error. "It can be a system or human error, but somebody could also have done this intentionally," De Jonge said. "We don't manage the DNS ourselves, it is a system controlled by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) with worldwide replicas." http://www.idg.net/ic_386962_1793_1-1681.html
I have read that article many, many time today, trying to see how you came to that conclusion and I don't get it. To reach that conclusion, you've clearly quoted them out of the context of the larger article. Even to reach that conclusion from the small part you quoted requires a logical leap that is inappropriate, if not outright incorrect. I personally worked on that case for nearly eight hours today, right up until the resolution. I can tell you it was a learning experience for everyone involved. There were clearly some mistakes made, but it is also the case that there were a _lot_ of different things going on that contributed to the problem or complicated its resolution. However, jumping to such a conclusion is out of line, especially with the clout and respect you have on this mailing list. It has inflamed the responses of dozens of list members who want nothing more than to smack back at Microsoft, regardless of the truth in their statements. Microsoft did *not* blame ICANN in that article. I wouldn't put it past a spokesperson, Microsoft or otherwise, to make that mistake, but that clearly wasn't the case here. Let's not complicate the issue by making the same mistakes in our own comments. Thanks. Jim -- Jim Duncan, Product Security Incident Manager, Cisco Systems, Inc. <http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/sec_incident_response.shtml> E-mail: <jnduncan () cisco com> Phone(Direct/FAX): +1 919 392 6209
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Simon Lockhart (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Daniel Roesen (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Andy (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Steven J. Sobol (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Alex Pilosov (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Scott Gifford (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Simon Lockhart (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Scott Gifford (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Jim Duncan (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Wojtek Zlobicki (Feb 24)
- RE: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Roeland Meyer (Feb 24)
- RE: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Henry Yen (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Morris Allen (Feb 24)
- RE: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Adrian Chadd (Feb 24)
- Re: Microsoft spokesperson blames ICANN Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)