nanog mailing list archives
Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems)
From: Daniel Senie <dts () senie com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:48:56 -0500
Well, whether Microsoft gets their DNS records fixed or not in the root zones (assuming that's even the problem), they STILL won't get much traffic from some avenues. Packet loss rates to many destinations off ATT's network range from 50% to 100% Looking at traces to Microsoft's DNS servers (which are all hosted on the same ISP backbone, bad idea) shows 50% packet loss right now from ATT Broadband. It's possible the servers will actually answer DNS queries, but the protocols don't survive all that well in the face of 50% or greater packet loss. Looks like several problems in the wild today... -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Senie dts () senie com Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranth.com
Current thread:
- Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) John Payne (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Dave McKay (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Daniel Senie (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Craig Partridge (Feb 24)
- RFC 2182 was: Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Jim Mercer (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) jamie rishaw (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Dave McKay (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Daniel Roesen (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Chris Cappuccio (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Dave McKay (Feb 24)
- Re: Great job AT&T (re: Microsoft problems) Steven J. Sobol (Feb 24)