nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP and anycast


From: Marc Slemko <marcs () znep com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:58:21 -0800 (PST)


On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 hardie () equinix com wrote:

  One potential problem with using shared unicast addresses is that
  routers forwarding traffic to them may have more than one available
  route, and those routes may, in fact, reach different instances of
  the shared unicast address.  Because UDP is self-contained, UDP
  traffic from a single source reaching different instances presents
  no problem.  TCP traffic, in contrast, may fail or present

That should be a little more precise.

TCP packets can not (for all practical purposes when dealing with "normal"
clients) be self contained.

UDP packets are self contained, from the network view.

But that does not mean that a particular protocol implemented on top of
UDP will necessarily still be self contained, merely that it is possible
for it to be.



Current thread: