Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?

[John Hawkinson <jhawk () bbnplanet com>]

I said:
> > Nevertheless, the operational reality is that having a traceroute that
> > shows RFC1918 addresses is more useful than a traceroute that shows
> > * * *, and therefore I suspect most operators will continue to permit
> > RFC1918 addresses into their networks as long as a few questionable
> > individuals use them to source traffic.
>
> i think it's only useful to show that (a) something's there

Yes, and that's sufficient justification for me. I don't particularly
like traffic filters.

--jhawk