nanog mailing list archives
Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization
From: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa () samurai sfo dead-dog com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 14:28:33 -0800
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 04:53:30PM -0500, Adam Rothschild wrote:
Agreed. Likewise, I'd give some thought to using BIND again -- even paying for it -- if some commercial Vixie entity put out something like: lynx -dump http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/guarantee.html | sed -e s/"D. J. Bernstein"/ISC/g -e s/djbdns/BIND/g
Yeah, that's some guarantee there, you betcha... Specifically, the parts that read: "I offer $500 to the first person to publicly report a verifiable security hole in the latest version of djbdns" AND: "My judgment is final as to what constitutes a security hole in djbdns." It's easy to offer money to your users when only 5 people worldwide use your software. (And I'm convinced at least 4 of them are on this list.) --msa
Current thread:
- Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization Jeffrey Meltzer (Feb 24)
- Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization Adam Rothschild (Feb 24)
- Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization Majdi S. Abbas (Feb 24)
- Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization Bill Woodcock (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re:BIND, djbdns, commercialization rkuhljr (Feb 24)
- Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization Majdi S. Abbas (Feb 24)
- Re: BIND, djbdns, commercialization Adam Rothschild (Feb 24)