nanog mailing list archives
Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor.
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:43:40 -0800
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 09:06:51PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
1) Workaround provided by James is incorrect. You need RW not RO.
No, you only need to specify RO... at least according to the tests I've just run. As I understand it you're overriding a built in community. -- John Payne http://www.sackheads.org/jpayne/ john () sackheads org http://www.sackheads.org/uce/ Fax: +44 870 0547954 To send me mail, use the address in the From: header
Current thread:
- Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. Simon Lyall (Feb 26)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. Jared Mauch (Feb 26)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. John Payne (Feb 26)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. Jared Mauch (Feb 26)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. John Kristoff (Feb 26)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. Jonathan Disher (Feb 26)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. Eric Germann (Feb 26)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. John Fraizer (Feb 26)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. Eric Germann (Feb 26)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. mike harrison (Feb 27)
- RE: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. Alexander Kiwerski (Feb 27)
- RE: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. Alexander Kiwerski (Feb 27)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. John Payne (Feb 26)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. Jared Mauch (Feb 26)
- Re: Warning: Cisco RW community backdoor. John Fraizer (Feb 26)