nanog mailing list archives
Re: Beer and Gear surprise
From: abha <ahuja () wibh net>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:29:01 -0800 (PST)
I disagree. Read my other post. The charter defines membership. Of course it is entirely too broad. As I interpret it, if you are a network operator, researcher or vendor, you may be a member of NANOG.
Right, it is a broad definition.
The charter does not define community, only membership.
Maybe it isn't clear enough to you, but if you read the charter and the addendum, it is the case that membership == community. There isn't a "membership" in the sense of paying dues, etc. This goes back to the days of the regional techs meetings and the whole point of NANOG... Okay, now i'm done... :) -abha ;)
Current thread:
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise, (continued)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Martin Hannigan (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise abha (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Sam Thomas (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Etaoin Shrdlu (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Dave Snodgrass (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Daniel L. Golding (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Danny McPherson (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Alex Bligh (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Ukyo Kuonji (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise abha (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Chris Kilbourn (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise abha (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Re: Beer and Gear surprise Jeffrey Haas (Feb 24)