nanog mailing list archives
RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 18:34:10 -0800
From: Paul A Vixie [mailto:vixie () mfnx net] Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 3:03 PM
The category "OS vendors" gets a little fishy... Do LinusTorvalds andAlan Cox get on the list if they sign the NDA? How about Patrick Volkerding?If they're mature trustworthy people (I know Linus but not those other guys) and if they need some time to get patches ready for large user bases, then I feel sure that they'd be welcomed gladly.
The catagory "OS vendors" may be a canard. MHSC is a Caldera VAR, but we also have live servers and so do our clients. We had already deployed BIND-8.2.3 before Caldera even made it available. That channel takes too long. I'm not a direct Sun customer, but I'll wager that Sun has yet to make it available to their customers. The same goes for HP and IBM.
Current thread:
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded, (continued)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Adam Rothschild (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Roeland Meyer (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Roeland Meyer (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Paul A Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Christopher Ambler (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jeff Workman (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Mathew Butler (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jeffrey Meltzer (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Joe Rhett (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Roeland Meyer (Feb 24)
- Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Jeffrey Meltzer (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Roeland Meyer (Feb 24)
- RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)