nanog mailing list archives

Re: AS701 peer local-pref?


From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 04:19:14 -0500


        they could just be relying on as_path+bgp bestpath

        but yeah, i personally prefer a model of
localprefs in this order (highest first obviously)

        customer
        peer
        upstream
        
        this puts traffic across links that you get paid for,
you get for (free?) a lower cost than upstream/transit then
the most expensive link.

        - jared

On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 01:07:39AM -0800, Mike Leber wrote:
If they set local pref for both peers and customers to 100 how do they
ensure that the customer transit routes are announced to peers?

The reason I ask this is because if a customer announces a customer of
theirs to you that a peer also has as a customer you will have equal
length routes for the same destination AS.  While there are many ways to
deterministicly prefer customer routes, local pref is the most common.
-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.


Current thread: