nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS701 peer local-pref?
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 04:19:14 -0500
they could just be relying on as_path+bgp bestpath but yeah, i personally prefer a model of localprefs in this order (highest first obviously) customer peer upstream this puts traffic across links that you get paid for, you get for (free?) a lower cost than upstream/transit then the most expensive link. - jared On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 01:07:39AM -0800, Mike Leber wrote:
If they set local pref for both peers and customers to 100 how do they ensure that the customer transit routes are announced to peers? The reason I ask this is because if a customer announces a customer of theirs to you that a peer also has as a customer you will have equal length routes for the same destination AS. While there are many ways to deterministicly prefer customer routes, local pref is the most common.
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Current thread:
- AS701 peer local-pref? Me (Dec 12)
- Re: AS701 peer local-pref? German Martinez (Dec 12)
- Re: AS701 peer local-pref? Christopher A. Woodfield (Dec 14)
- Re: AS701 peer local-pref? Me (Dec 14)
- Re: AS701 peer local-pref? Mike Leber (Dec 16)
- Re: AS701 peer local-pref? Jared Mauch (Dec 16)
- Re: AS701 peer local-pref? Randy Bush (Dec 16)
- Re: AS701 peer local-pref? Mike Leber (Dec 16)
- Re: AS701 peer local-pref? Christopher A. Woodfield (Dec 14)
- Re: AS701 peer local-pref? German Martinez (Dec 12)