nanog mailing list archives

Re: What is the limit? (was RE: multi-homing fixes)


From: up () 3 am
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:21:40 -0400 (EDT)


On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Leo Bicknell wrote:

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:58:03AM -0700, Sean M. Doran wrote:
If the size or the dynamicism of the global routing system grows
for a sustained period faster than the price/performance curve of
EITHER memory OR processing power, the Internet will FAIL again.

This is great FUD.  First rate.  Have you considered working on a
political campaign?  This statement seems so true, but is so false.
We are all being held hostage by vendors here, and I hope the rest
of the people on here are letting them know as loudly as I do at
every opportunity.

Routers, in terms of route processing ability, are about as far from
state of the art as computers get these days.  I can buy a < $1000
PC with 10x the MIPS and twice the memory of major vendors largest

<snip rant>

There is certainly some truth about re: planned obsolescence of very
expensive routers, but every time I hear this argument, it always seems to
overlook the three most important factors in big router hardware
performance: I/O, I/O and I/O.

Nonetheless, it's still annoying as hell that Cisco can't just allow a GB
or more of RAM in 5-6 figure router and just be done with that aspect of
it...

James Smallacombe                     PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
up () 3 am                                                          http://3.am
=========================================================================



Current thread: