nanog mailing list archives
RE: multi-homing fixes
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:33:16 -0700
|> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com] |> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:51 PM |> |> the point of 2xDS3 was specifically to get major services, |> and not to get |> every basement dual-homer. do the latter and you have the |> same grazing |> of the commons as we have today. Considering the cost of a DS1, in California anyways, I might disagree with you. DS1 is steep enough, DS3's are much too steep and sounds much too anti-competitive. Randy, you also know the rates the rest of the planet pays for E1's and E2's, if they can even get anything that fast. If you want a speed-bump then don't build a speed-farging-mountain. What you are saying is that businesses that can't afford the monthlies of a pair of DS3's aren't allowed to be in business? Is that an official position? How would you like it if you were in that position? Can I quote you on that?
Current thread:
- RE: multi-homing fixes, (continued)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David R. Conrad (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David R. Conrad (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes hardie (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes bmanning (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Dmitri Krioukov (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Craig Pierantozzi (Aug 27)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Rafi Sadowsky (Aug 27)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Majdi S. Abbas (Aug 27)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Patrick Greenwell (Aug 27)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Majdi S. Abbas (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes John Fraizer (Aug 27)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Majdi S. Abbas (Aug 27)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Vadim Antonov (Aug 28)