nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS VPNs or not?
From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred () gwi net>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 15:50:00 -0400
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:55:03 -0400 "Kavi, Prabhu" wrote:
I thought this was interesting as well. This other group within AT&T has obviously looked at the potential scaling problems, the risks associated with it, and continue to deploy it. As a side note, this group has built large networks in the past, and given the size and scope of their networks, have a stability that most operators would envy. Oh by the way, they are profitable too. Randy, what was your point again?
1980 X.25 1984 OSI 1991 ATM 2000 MPLS good luck, fletcher P.S. Can anyone think of an effective way to sell MPLS futures short?
Current thread:
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not?, (continued)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Vadim Antonov (Aug 08)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Yakov Rekhter (Aug 08)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Vadim Antonov (Aug 08)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Robert Raszuk (Aug 08)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Dave Israel (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? jlewis (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Christian Kuhtz (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Fletcher E Kittredge (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Dave Israel (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Craig Partridge (Aug 07)
- RE: MPLS VPNs or not? Daniel Golding (Aug 07)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Neil J. McRae (Aug 08)
- RE: MPLS VPNs or not? James Cumming (Aug 08)
- Re: MPLS VPNs or not? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 08)