nanog mailing list archives

Re: MPLS VPNs or not?


From: Robert Raszuk <raszuk () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 08:37:11 -0700


Randy,

For me you can complain to vedors that they make crappy boxes which
don't do what you need. That is fine and I will not say a one bad word
against it. 

On the other hand I (helping to deploy mpls-vpns around the world for a
few years in a number of networks including these days even your ATT)
just can't watch stating that the arcitecture of 2547 is screwed only
because current platforms don't scale 5 years ahead.

R.

Randy Bush wrote:

5 years from now you will see routers from multiple vedors allowing you
to store & process orders of mangnitute of more routes.

good, because i will need them for the normal default-free zone.

but today, the vendors seem to think i need massively more routers to
support this grotty hack.  and i suspect that you'll be telling me i
still need that whoileparallel network five years from now.

randy


Current thread: