nanog mailing list archives

Re: Code Red Hammering Away


From: <michael () aplatform com>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 13:18:20 -0700 (PDT)


Hello Etaoin,

On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:


Yes, it's true, I fixed the attribution. Young whippersnappers!

michael () aplatform com wrote:

On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Lou Katz wrote:

My little Class C seems to be getting 3-6 attempts per second to
connect to Port 80 on various IPs at the present time. Is this
about average?

Its more than what I am getting.  Never the less since this started again
im seeing alot more attempts than in July.

I see about 300% more attempts than in July, but close to one-third of
those do not appear to be code red. They seem to be what I would have
suspected. People trying to mask attempts under the noise of code red.
Nonetheless, it is getting annoying enough that I am close to moving all
the windoze machines off to a private switched network until this is over.

I can see they are "valid" CR attempts..


No, I'm not afraid of them being compromised, but some of them do seem to
be getting hit harder than the rest of my computers. What I don't
understand is why my openbsd laptop attracts so much attention.

Uname -a shows OpenBSD scorpion 2.6 GENERIC#696 i386, hardly an attractive
target for code red in my book. No, it's not running a web server. The only
service it actually offers is sshd.

At first it was interesting, then annoying, now it's just boring. Most of
the non-code red attempts I see are from apnic, for what that's worth.

--
You've confused equality of opportunity for equality of outcomes,
and have seriously confused justice with equality.
                                -- Woodchuck



Current thread: