nanog mailing list archives
Re: [OT] RE: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ?
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 12:48:16 -0400
You are forgetting about the people who build hardware just to crack this. I think the important thing here is to use good security practices when connecting to your routers/equipment. The second thing that is even *more* important is insuring that your vendor makes it easy to access images that can use secure connection methods. - Jared On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 08:15:47AM -0400, Greg Maxwell wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:You are probably aware, but EFF published the DES crack. I understand that it is now an issue of cracking DES in less than 12 hours. 3DES is better but it only amounts to DES with a 128-bit key. Definitely a limited shelf-live.2^128/2^56 * 12hrs = 6.46 * 10^18 years I take it that you plan on living a lot longer then I do?
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Current thread:
- [OT] RE: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ? Greg Maxwell (Aug 01)
- Re: [OT] RE: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ? Jared Mauch (Aug 01)
- Re: [OT] RE: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ? David Howe (Aug 01)
- Re: [OT] RE: telnet vs ssh on Core equipment , looking for reasons why ? Jared Mauch (Aug 01)