nanog mailing list archives
RE: black hat .cn networks
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:49:27 -0700
From: Jim Mercer [mailto:jim () reptiles org] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:23 PM On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:11:25PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:How quickly can CN be firewalled anyway?As quickly as you can write route-map filtersi don't know that it will be that easy.
That's kind of my point ...
surely, not all of china connects through a single AS.
My understanding is that CN has been looking for ways and means to firewall itself for years. It's not entirely fond of the wild and woolly Internet.
as well, i suspect that the same hackers would be able to manage a dial-up into some extra-china ISP.
This is exactly why CN has been unsuccessful in their quest.
Current thread:
- RE: black hat .cn networks, (continued)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Segal, Mark (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Brett Frankenberger (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks k claffy (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks George William Herbert (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Richard A. Steenbergen (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Shawn McMahon (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Roger Marquis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Kevin Day (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Roeland Meyer (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Segal, Mark (Apr 30)