nanog mailing list archives
RE: black hat .cn networks
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Alex Bligh wrote:
I just love the way (some) Americans bleat about their supposed constitutional rights to have their packets passed between any given pair of networks, but (perhaps others) are quite happy to route-map out entire subcontinents on the basis there might be a few (i.e. statistically insignificant number of) trouble makers there...
AS4134 is totally black hat. 100% rogue and haven for spammers and crackers. They have a bogus replybot which gives automated bullshit excuses to abuse reports.
Somehow I just can't imagine someone suggesting AOL / Earthlink (& I've seen plenty of 'interesting' packets from there) are blackholed for the same reason would get away with this on NANOG.
because aol/earthlink actually bother to respond to abuse reports (albeit slowly). AS4134 basically tells you to fuck off and eat your spam and tolerate their script kiddies. -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: black hat .cn networks, (continued)
- Re: black hat .cn networks John Fraizer (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Mark Mentovai (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Steve Schaefer (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks scott w (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Roeland Meyer (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Jim Mercer (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks k claffy (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Alex Bligh (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks mdevney (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Mike Leber (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks Brett Frankenberger (Apr 30)
- RE: black hat .cn networks Dan Hollis (Apr 30)
- Re: black hat .cn networks k claffy (Apr 30)