nanog mailing list archives
RE: jumbo frames
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:11:58 -0700
In both cases, it is a bandwidth issue. You either consume the bandwidth in the CPU or consume it on the wire. CPU is cheaper and often under-utilized. Of the two, CPU bandwidth is also cheaper/easier to upgrade.
-----Original Message----- From: Rowland, Alan D [mailto:alan_r1 () corp earthlink net] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: 'Kurt Kayser'; Tony Hain Cc: Roeland Meyer; John Fraizer; Paul Lantinga; nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: jumbo frames I am not an EE but maybe if you rephrased the question as Which is greater, the cpu cycles to assemble/dissemble jumbo frames or the additional cycles/bandwidth of more numerous ACK packets? Then again, I may be way out of my depth here. -Al -----Original Message----- From: Kurt Kayser [mailto:kurt () noris de] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 8:07 AM To: Tony Hain Cc: Roeland Meyer; John Fraizer; Paul Lantinga; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: jumbo frames Hi, Isn't it a lot more cpu-intensive to 'collect' some 1500-byte frames into some larger bucket, reassemble it into a jumbo-frame when the next box has to chop it in order to send it out on a Sonet/PPP/etc interface which might have a smaller MTU again? Doesn't make too much sense to me. I guess that was Tony's aim as well.. KurtRoeland you are talking about jumbo frames from the endsystem lan, whileJohn is talking about only using the jumbo frames betweenthe routers. Mypoint was that in John's environment the packets will allbe 1500 since thepackets are restricted to that size just to get to therouter with the GEinterface. I understand that there are perf gains as longas the entire pathsupports the larger packets, but I don't understand theclaim that having abigger pipe in the middle helps. Tony-- noris network AG * tel +49 911 93 52-0 * internet Kilianstraße 142 * fax +49 911 93 52-100 * solution 90425 Nürnberg * http://www.noris.net * provider
Current thread:
- RE: jumbo frames, (continued)
- RE: jumbo frames Tony Hain (Apr 26)
- RE: jumbo frames Roeland Meyer (Apr 26)
- RE: jumbo frames Tony Hain (Apr 26)
- Re: jumbo frames Kurt Kayser (Apr 27)
- Re: jumbo frames Greg Maxwell (Apr 27)
- RE: jumbo frames Tony Hain (Apr 27)
- RE: jumbo frames Tony Hain (Apr 26)
- RE: jumbo frames Tony Hain (Apr 27)
- Re: jumbo frames John Fraizer (Apr 27)
- Re: jumbo frames Richard A. Steenbergen (Apr 27)