nanog mailing list archives
RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20
From: mike harrison <meuon () highertech net>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 18:18:33 -0400 (EDT)
I looked, they had the same price-tag as a /20 or /19. The price isn't the issue, though ... routing *is*. Qualifying for a /20, when you only really need a /24, is a PITA (not to mention, leaving you feeling a bit sleazy).
I understand the issue of "it costs just as much administration overhead as a /24 as a /20", and there is probably some more overhead for more addresses. It also raises the bar.. do they REALLY need it? It's #1 on tomorrows (and the next several weeks) agenda - Thanks --Mike--
Current thread:
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20, (continued)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Majdi S. Abbas (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Hank Nussbacher (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 John Fraizer (Apr 10)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Majdi S. Abbas (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Segal, Mark (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Kyle C. Bacon (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Matt Levine (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 David Schwartz (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 mike harrison (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Bill Nickless (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Matt Levine (Apr 09)
- RE: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 mike harrison (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Eric A. Hall (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Andy Dills (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Eric Gauthier (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Eric A. Hall (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 bmanning (Apr 09)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Eric A. Hall (Apr 09)