nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS Leakage
From: Travis Pugh <tpugh () shore net>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:08:58 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Christian Nielsen wrote:
I have a question. Why do you allow Private ASNs into your network? We saw
<condescending crap removed> Probably because making your upstream type "neighbor x.x.x.x remove-private-AS" is a little more efficient than doing: route-map already-full-of-IANA-reserved-filters deny 10 match as-path 1 ip as-path access-list 1 permit _64[5-9][1-9][2-9]_ ip as-path access-list 1 permit _65..._ or, if I want to be sloppy, ip as-path access-list 1 permit _6[45]..._ and applying it to all my bleeding transit. Cheers. -travis
Christian
Current thread:
- AS Leakage Marshall Eubanks (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Hank Nussbacher (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Travis Pugh (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Joe Provo (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Kevin Oberman (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Christian Nielsen (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Travis Pugh (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Rich Fulton (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage John Fraizer (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Christian Nielsen (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage bmanning (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Jared Mauch (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Joe Provo (Apr 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AS Leakage troy (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage John Fraizer (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Steve Noble (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Darrin Walton (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage Josh Richards (Apr 04)
- Re: AS Leakage John Fraizer (Apr 04)