nanog mailing list archives
Re: 64 Megs of Memory...
From: scott w <scott () digisle net>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:06:39 +0000 (GMT)
The session wasn't lost. Set it to warn you well before killing the session. scott ps. It wasn't Sprint... On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, scott w wrote:Saw more than that from one of the big boys today. %BGP-4-MAXPFX: Number of unicast prefixes received from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx reaches 96857sprint does this to us every few weeks. never seen it from any of our other links."neighbor xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx maximim-prefix" is your friend... ;-)maximum-prefix sucks because it kills your session, but sucks less than killing the entire bgp router process. i wish there was an option to simply drop announcements over the limit rather than killing the session. -Dan
Current thread:
- 64 Megs of Memory... Segal, Mark (Sep 29)
- Re: 64 Megs of Memory... scott w (Sep 29)
- Re: 64 Megs of Memory... Dan Hollis (Sep 29)
- Re: 64 Megs of Memory... scott w (Sep 29)
- Re: 64 Megs of Memory... Dan Hollis (Sep 29)
- Re: 64 Megs of Memory... scott w (Sep 29)