nanog mailing list archives
Re: netscan.org update
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 18:10:08 -0700
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 08:19:58PM -0700, Troy Davis wrote:
Netscan.org hasn't created a BGP blackhole announcement out of lack of time and because, at least while some significant sites are on it, we doubt many people would use it. Interestingly, looking at the top smurf-announcing ASNs, an average American backbone could block easily half of them and barely notice.
I've been very quiet on the scanning for smurf amps thing... which is contrary to my nature :-) However, I would really not like to see a BGP based listing of smurf amps based on results from scanning. E-mailing network operators who have smurf amps that happen to not have been abused (maybe its a /30 with little bandwidth) smacks of UBE to me... and you shouldn't be listing without notification... -- John Payne http://www.sackheads.org/jpayne/ john () sackheads org http://www.sackheads.org/uce/ Fax: +44 870 0547954 To send me mail, use the address in the From: header
Current thread:
- Re: netscan.org update, (continued)
- Re: netscan.org update James A. T. Rice (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update James A. T. Rice (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Bill Woodcock (Sep 24)
- Message not available
- Re: netscan.org update John Payne (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update dies (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Jason Slagle (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update John Payne (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update John Fraizer (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update Henry R. Linneweh (Sep 26)
- Re: netscan.org update Daniel Senie (Sep 26)
- Re: netscan.org update Henry R. Linneweh (Sep 26)