nanog mailing list archives
Re: InterNAP?
From: Mike Johnson <mike.johnson () isunnetworks com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 18:52:30 -0500
Tom Schmidt [tsch52 () hotmail com] wrote:
InterNap has some technology to avoid congested peering points. Does this technology actually work? Isn't it impossible to avoid these peering points? What are your experiences with InterNAP?
I'm not a customer, but I spoke with a salesdriod there. All they do is go in, set up their own geographicly disperse private peering points and link them together with their private backbone. They set these things up by buying service from the other large backbone folk. The idea being that, in general, if they can get their traffic onto the same backbone that the end user is connected to, then it's avoided the public peering points. It's a good theory. Dunno if it works. Mike -- Mike Johnson Network Engineer / iSun Networks, Inc. Morrisville, NC All opinions are mine, not those of my employer
Current thread:
- InterNAP? Tom Schmidt (Oct 30)
- Re: InterNAP? Mike Johnson (Oct 30)
- Re: InterNAP? David A. Snodgrass (Oct 30)
- Re: InterNAP? Alex (Oct 30)
- Re: InterNAP? Mark Mentovai (Oct 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: InterNAP? Rishi Singh (Oct 30)
- RE: InterNAP? Spolidoro, Guilherme (Oct 31)
- Re: InterNAP? Stephen Sprunk (Oct 31)
- Re: InterNAP? Bradley Dunn (Oct 31)
- Re: InterNAP? Sean Donelan (Oct 31)
- Re: InterNAP? Mike Johnson (Oct 30)