RE: Anyone heard anything Good or Bad about Juniper equipment ?

["Daniel L. Golding" <dan () netrail net>]

Yes. (although interop with Cisco's is pretty smooth.)

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, James Cabe wrote:

> OSPF between Junipers, or between Junipers and other vendor's hardware?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
> > Daniel L. Golding
> > Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 11:53 AM
> > To: Vijay Gill
> > Cc: Mr. James W. Laferriere; nanog () merit edu
> > Subject: Re: Anyone heard anything Good or Bad about Juniper equipment ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Stay away from the OSPF. 9 out of 10 engineers agree: If you use Juniper,
> > use ISIS. Or become very good at troubleshooting OSPF. 
> >
> > - Dan Golding
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Vijay Gill wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> > >
> > > >         Hello All ,  Replying off list would be best & I can summarize if
> > > >         anyone has interest .  Have my eye's on acquiring a couple of
> > > >         their larger units .  I Just need some feedback from -real- users .
> > >
> > > I have worked for two very large providers with juniper equipment. Like
> > > all equipment, they have their flaws but they are so much 
> > better than the
> > > next closes vendor that its not even funny.
> > >
> > > Much better response from engineers, much better code, much 
> > higher density
> > > per rack, and their line cards actually can do oc192 
> > >
> > > /vijay