nanog mailing list archives

Re: Traceroute versus other performance measurement


From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet () graffiti com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 23:49:56 -0500


I need help with a reality/sanity check.   Traceroute is a good tool for
checking for routing type problems (loops).  Does anyone feel it's a good tool

It's probably a poor tool for all kinds of really good technical reasons,
but  "Matts traceroute" aka MTR is useful to me, often shows overstressed
routers or connections... especially when normal traceroute just shows
garbage. 

the fact that it does all the probes in parallel, without waiting for
any single probe to time out is definitely a plus.

Example screen: 
...

try mtr with -r (report mode) and -c (number of probe cycles to send)
to get nice little snapshots.

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior () daemon org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet () graffiti com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew () crossbar com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."



Current thread: