nanog mailing list archives
Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions)
From: abha <ahuja () wibh net>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 15:32:20 -0800 (PST)
Lets make it a requirement of the router vendors.no doubt. and there are new vendors stepping up to the table - some of which dont have ear wax (yet?), hoping to get a piece of the backbone market. what do we do for today, with the widgets we have? what do we (collectively) want to ask vendors to implement?
excellent! (collective) vendor wish lists are a good idea! -abha ;)
Current thread:
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Sean Donelan (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Sean Donelan (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) abha (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Bora Akyol (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) john heasley (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Sean Donelan (Nov 15)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Kurt Kayser (Nov 16)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) John Fraizer (Nov 16)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Kurt Kayser (Nov 16)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) John Fraizer (Nov 16)
- Re: [doable?] peer filtering (was Re: Trusting BGP sessions) Kurt Kayser (Nov 16)