nanog mailing list archives

Re: InterNAP?


From: Andrew Daniels <adaniels () imageek org>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 08:36:34 -0800 (PST)


We use InterNAP as one of our providers, we've not had problems with link
status or usage of the bandwidth that has been spoken of here.  The
biggest problem we have with it is the cost, while other carriers for the
most part are a lot cheaper and are considering reducing rates for
higher-capacity lines, it appears that InterNAP will have none of that.

Andrew

---
Director of Security & Network Engineering          NetLedger, Inc.


On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Tom Schmidt wrote:

Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:41:40 GMT
From: Tom Schmidt <tsch52 () hotmail com>
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: InterNAP?


I need your opinion on InterNAP.  I am currently have a DS3 to my current 
provider and want to add an additional DS3 for redundancy to the same 
location.  We plan to run BGP4 on both connections.

InterNap has some technology to avoid congested peering points. Does this 
technology actually work?  Isn't it impossible to avoid these peering 
points?  What are your experiences with InterNAP?

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.







Current thread: