nanog mailing list archives
Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug...
From: Michael Shields <shields () msrl com>
Date: 25 May 2000 05:50:42 +0000
In article <20000524163200.D367 () ewok creative net au>, Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au> wrote:
Cryptographically signing here ensures someone isn't going to tamper with your route announcements in transit. When script kiddies have the technology to splice fibre cabes in their backyard and sniff/replace data at line speed, I'm sure they will have more fun things to do than mess with your BGP session.
Are you as confident about the security of exchange point fabrics? -- Shields.
Current thread:
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug..., (continued)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... Peter T. Whiting (May 23)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... Vijay Gill (May 23)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... Blaine Christian (May 23)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... Vijay Gill (May 23)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... Jeff Haas (May 23)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... Vadim Antonov (May 23)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... Vijay Gill (May 23)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... Sean Donelan (May 23)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... John Fraizer (May 23)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... Adrian Chadd (May 24)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... Michael Shields (May 24)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... Adrian Chadd (May 24)
- Re: That pesky AS path corruption bug... John Fraizer (May 23)