nanog mailing list archives
Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these?
From: Chris Adams <chris () digitaria com>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:07:35 -0700
On 04/30/00 11:00:12 PM gfresen () ais net wrote:
No, it's worse than that. With your private key in their hands, they can write messages, put on appropriate dates and sign them ... then say that you wrote them. (depending upon the technology that is used)
Yes. Couple that with treating key confiscation as a minor thing and I'd be surprised if someone's key didn't end up accidentally being sent to a well- connected competitor. One possible line of defense other than complete civil disobediance might be providing only the session key(s) used for encrypted documents instead of the key-pair. It'd be interesting to see if the courts accept this.
Current thread:
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? jlewis (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Chris Adams (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? John Fraizer (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Chris Adams (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Chris Adams (Apr 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Adam McKenna (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Chris Adams (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Adam McKenna (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? John Butler (May 02)
- The Boston *KEY* Party... John Fraizer (May 01)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Chris Adams (Apr 30)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? Peter Galbavy (May 05)
- Re: How long before NIPC decides we need one of these? John Fraizer (May 05)