nanog mailing list archives
RE: Private ASN suppression
From: "Dmitri Krioukov" <dima () dimension net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 16:25:42 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Danny McPherson Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 2:45 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Private ASN suppression In short, see RFC 2270.
...as well as rfc2260. to be more specific, we have to note that two different options are considered there. if you use the first one (read rfc), then you cannot use private asn until you're ok with generating inconsistencies (and it seems from the previous discussions of this topic that this becomes (illegal? -> no answer...) practice for some smaller isps). with the second option of 2260, you can use private asn since the more specific pa routes are always aggregated (and you cannot use confederations, btw). after all, as was noted, remove-private-as on cisco can be replaced by a simple route map, and the attribute manipulation functionality should definitely exist on versalars... -- dima.
Current thread:
- Private ASN suppression Howard C. Berkowitz (May 16)
- Re: Private ASN suppression Tony Mumm (May 16)
- Re: Private ASN suppression Howard C. Berkowitz (May 16)
- Re: Private ASN suppression Tony Mumm (May 16)
- Re: Private ASN suppression Daniel L. Golding (May 18)
- Re: Private ASN suppression Dave Bergum (May 16)
- Re: Private ASN suppression Howard C. Berkowitz (May 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Private ASN suppression Danny McPherson (May 16)
- RE: Private ASN suppression Dmitri Krioukov (May 16)
- Re: Private ASN suppression Danny McPherson (May 16)
- RE: Private ASN suppression Dmitri Krioukov (May 16)
- Re: Private ASN suppression Tony Mumm (May 16)