nanog mailing list archives

Re: UUNET outage in Palo Alto


From: Danny McPherson <danny () tcb net>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 22:45:44 -0600



While I certainly understand your point John, I definitely
understand Susan's.

This leads back to the discussion a few weeks ago regarding
"damage control" and the like.  Think about it.  If [foo]
posted and said [insert_company_here] sucks but [company]
had no idea who foo was, or why they were telling a few
thousand potential customers that they sucked, well, I can 
understand [company] having a problem with that.  Especially 
if foo@domainname was actually a competietor, or for some 
reason they believed foo may be.

I could even understand [company] telling the Merit folks 
that they had a real problem with it, and strongly suggesting 
they see that it doesn't happen again.

I'm not pointing fingers at anyone, just sharing an 
observation.

-danny



Some of us don't have the luxury of living under the veil of academia and
as such, use "alternate" email accounts when posting information that
while ON-TOPIC and of OPERATIONAL use, may cause significant political
fallout.

It might not fit the AUP.  So be it.  It was significantly above the
typical S:N ratio for the list and as such, I believe that YOU are out of
line in chastising the individual in question.

If you don't like my particular opinion on the subject, please take it up
with those in my company who have the powers to make my job go away. 




Current thread: