nanog mailing list archives

Re: OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls)

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 13:24:28 -0400

You're of course free to do as you wish, but I personally think the whole
idea of a 'Women in Networking' list is absurd, revanchist, and sexist


you will be sent a full refund.  in the meantime, don't subscribe.

randy

Current thread:

OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) rdobbins (Jun 09)
- Re: OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) Adrian Chadd (Jun 09)
- Re: OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) Randy Bush (Jun 09)
- Re: OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) William Allen Simpson (Jun 09)
  - RE: OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) Alexander Kiwerski (Jun 09)
  - Re: OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) Shawn McMahon (Jun 09)
- Re: OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) John Fraizer (Jun 09)
  - Re: OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) Ana Susanj (Jun 09)
    - Re: OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) John Fraizer (Jun 10)
- RE: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) Rachel Luxemburg (Jun 09)
  - Re: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) Matt Ranney (Jun 10)
  - RE: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) Rich Sena (Jun 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls) Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 09)

(Thread continues...)