nanog mailing list archives
Re: public key service
From: Joshua Goodall <joshua () roughtrade net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 08:03:40 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
No, Randy has a need -- an operational need that I suspect many on this list share. His note simply says that the current system is inadequate for production use; a more recent note asks, in about these words, "what can he (and other operators) do" to help the situation.
what I have done in the past is refer people to my RIPE PGPKEY object, which possibly adds to (rather than aids) the fragmentation situation ... and may not be available to those without a trusted mntner. -[ Joshua Goodall ]----------------------------------------------- -[ IP Systems Developer ]---------------- Cook, Geek, Lover ------ -[ joshuag () interxion com ]--------------- joshua () roughtrade net --
Current thread:
- Re: public key service, (continued)
- Re: public key service Robert M. Enger (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Shawn McMahon (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Patrick Greenwell (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Matt Braun (Jun 26)
- RE: public key service ktsolis (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Joseph Birthisel (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 26)
- Re: public key service Joshua Goodall (Jun 26)
- Re: FW: public key service Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 27)
- Re: FW: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 27)
- Re: FW: public key service bmanning (Jun 27)
- Re: FW: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 27)
- Re: public key service Randy Bush (Jun 27)
- Re: FW: public key service ktsolis (Jun 27)