nanog mailing list archives
Re: Private and Public Peering
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () mibh net>
Date: 19 Jun 2000 13:24:02 -0700
At 21:42 06/18/2000 -0700, Steve Feldman wrote:
The closest to a real distinction that I've been able to come up with is whether or not a third party is involved *and* whether packets (or cells) are switched.
smarcus () genuity com (Scott Marcus) writes:
What most people mean by "private peering" is a direct interconnection between two providers. That's most often implemented over a circuit between the two, without either deploying equipment to the other's premises; again, however, that's simply a matter of engineering convenience. These connections are conceptually point-to-point.
I like Steve's distinction better. When folks peer at PAIX, they do so with a "direct interconnection between two providers". The fact that both providers have extended their networks to PAIX, or are using PAIX as a POP, doesn't make the "peering" less "private". -- Paul Vixie <vixie () mibh net> SVP for Internet Services, MFNX M.I.B.H. Inc. is a subsidiary of Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc.
Current thread:
- Private and Public Peering HANSEN CHAN (Jun 18)
- Re: Private and Public Peering Steve Feldman (Jun 18)
- Re: Private and Public Peering Scott Marcus (Jun 19)
- Re: Private and Public Peering Paul Vixie (Jun 19)
- Re: Private and Public Peering Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Re: Private and Public Peering Scott Marcus (Jun 19)
- Re: Private and Public Peering Steve Feldman (Jun 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FW: Private and Public Peering Lane Patterson (Jun 19)
- Re: FW: Private and Public Peering Shawn McMahon (Jun 20)