nanog mailing list archives

Re: SUMMARY: bw usage?

From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 13:21:46 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)

You might want to look at cricket and RRDTool for a much more
scalable solution. [http://cricket.soundforge.net/].


   - Cisco 6500 switches apparently support "Private VLANS", which
     don't burn up IP addresses.  Sounds cool, wish I had a 6500 ;-)


I'd be interested in finding out more about this as we are currently
using CAT 6500 switches and burning up IP addresses can you tell
me more about this?



If I'm not mistaken, Private VLANs causes a big time split-horizon issue..

Current thread:

SUMMARY: bw usage? David M. Ramsey (Jul 28)
- Re: SUMMARY: bw usage? Neil J. McRae (Jul 28)
  - Re: SUMMARY: bw usage? Alex Rubenstein (Jul 28)
    - Cat 6k Private VLANs - was RE: SUMMARY: bw usage? Chance Whaley (Jul 28)
    - Re: Cat 6k Private VLANs - was RE: SUMMARY: bw usage? Jeremiah Kristal (Jul 28)
- Re: SUMMARY: bw usage? Greg A. Woods (Jul 28)