nanog mailing list archives
Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work?
From: Wayne Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 22:51:44 -0700
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 10:22:27PM -0700, Steve Carter wrote:
It's also worth noting that it's going to be easier for them to push enough traffic to justify more peering after such a merger, and additional transit arrangements can easily be made during the transition period. Acquisitions like this happen and these issues are resolved all the time.If you're confusing peering with transit then excuse me, but by purchasing another hosting business and, therefore, adding to EXDS's already terrible outbound vs inbound traffic ratios it will make obtaining good non-settlement peering even more difficult. A bunch (meaning: most of) the big backbones have peering guidelines regarding what a potential peers ratios must be to qualify. Like in the (out:in) 2:1 or 3:1 range.
Yes.. there is the question of wether the peers of GC would honor those agreements under ownership of exodus (probably not since most already have agreements with esodus and would force the contracts to be ammended to reflect exodus' terms) and wether or not they would suddenly decide that this is not such a good deal for them as peers.
Are they selling off Frontier Long Distance too?I believe the announcement was just about the GBLX LEC business and nothing definitive about anything else. -Steve
The announcement I saw from the WSJ said deffinitively GBLX Local (I assume rochester tel and etc) would go away and that rumors had gblx and exodus in talks over the globalcenter part (this would be just the data centers, not the long distance business or the ip backbone) and the money would be used to pay down gblx debt. Personally, I think it would be a bad idea. (remember, they also announced some months back that they were going to spin globalcenter off into a tracking stock. If the rumor of a sale is true, what does that say about management's oppinion of the business?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wayne Bouchard [Immagine Your ] web () typo org [Company Name Here] Network Engineer http://www.typo.org/~web/resume.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- GC/Exds deal -- How would it work? Jason Legate (Jul 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work? Richard A. Steenbergen (Jul 13)
- Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work? Mark Tripod (Jul 13)
- Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work? Jason Legate (Jul 13)
- Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work? Majdi S. Abbas (Jul 13)
- Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work? Steve Sobol (Jul 13)
- Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work? Ryan Tucker (Jul 13)
- NSI help offline michael (Jul 13)
- Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work? Steve Carter (Jul 13)
- Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work? Mark Tripod (Jul 13)
- Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work? Wayne Bouchard (Jul 13)
- Re: GC/Exds deal -- How would it work? Mark Tripod (Jul 13)